Re: /bin/sh or /bin/ash

["George Georgalis" <george@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Christopher JS Vance wrote:
>| OpenBSD uses its own well-maintained ksh as sh, even on the install
>| floppies.  Would it be reasonable to drop ash in favour of this?
>
>That's a pdksh derivative, which is 'less' than the original ksh
>according to zealots. Also, what's wrong with using sh as sh?

Cant find it... it would seem ash is more POSIX than Bourne sh.
So my question, should #!/bin/sh be POSIX or Bourne?

// George


-- 
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE
http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@xxxxxxxxx