DragonFly BSD
DragonFly bugs List (threaded) for 2006-02
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Futher mail woes

From: YONETANI Tomokazu <qhwt+dfly@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:28:56 +0900

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 11:45:21AM -0500, nida@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> I'm still having a problem getting qpopper (and now courier-{pop|imap}) to
> authenticate using pam.  Both systems report a similar message in
> /var/log/messages whenever a login is invoked.  As I mentioned, the error
> happens for both the imap and pop pam.d/ entries.
> service: in openpam_load_module(): no pam_unix.so found
> I have hardcoded the path to pam_unix.so (/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so), but
> that doesn't work.  The permissions are as such:
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel    13B Feb 18 04:27 pam_unix.so -> pam_unix.so.1
> -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel   9.7K Feb 18 04:27 pam_unix.so.1
> The machine was freshly (re)installed with the 1.4 release, and just updated to
> 1.4.1 last night.  Before the update, the permissions on pam_unix.so.1
> were 777 and I still got the error.

No, don't set it to world-writable, and you don't need executable
bits for shared libraries.

openpam_load_module() says "no pam_XXX.so found" when the module
failed to load.  It failed loading because of a missing symbol
login_getpwclass, which is defined in libutil, but qpopper isn't
linked against it.  The following command installs qpopper linked
against libutil, but it doesn't seem to be a correct solution though.

#  env LIBS=-lutil bmake install


[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]