Re: [issue352] SMP weirdness in 1.6.2-RELEASE

["Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, October 17, 2006 8:58 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
> Mike Jakubik <mikej@xxxxxxxxxx> added the comment:
>
> Im not really concerned with the lack of the device name, but more with
> the SMP
> issues. Is no one interested in debugging this?

I don't have the skills to fix the issue, but I could see if I can
duplicate it on my Dell machine that has the matching lack of device name,
though it's a uniprocessor machine.  Should a SMP kernel function on a
uniporicessor machine?