Re: [issue1116] HAMMER:file read speed

[lhmwzy <lhmwzy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok,there is maybe something wrong.
I download the same file from the same ftpd(windows ftpd).
So it is write speed,not read speed.
I do the test again:
the result as following:

ftp> put src.tar.gz
local: src.tar.gz remote: src.tar.gz
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,66,23,79,12,151)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for src.tar.gz.
100% |****************************************| 94806 KiB   11.21
MiB/s    00:00 ETA
226 Transfer complete.

ftp> get src.tar.gz
local: src.tar.gz remote: src.tar.gz
227 Entering Passive Mode (10,66,23,79,12,154)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for src.tar.gz (97081686 Bytes).
100% |****************************************| 94806 KiB    4.11
MiB/s    00:00 ETA
226 Transfer complete.
97081686 bytes received in 00:22 (4.11 MiB/s)

Can I say that the hammer fs read speed is normal,but write speed is abnormal?

2008/8/12 YONETANI Tomokazu <bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org>:
>
> YONETANI Tomokazu <qhwt+dfly@les.ath.cx> added the comment:
>
> Ok, I had to confirm something before asking you to do anything:
> are you downloading a 100Mbyte from a DragonFly FTP server, and
> talking about the difference in the transfer rate between when
> the filesystem from which ftpd reads is UFS or HAMMER? (which is
> what I assumed)  If so, your result below lacks the comparison between
> reading from DragonFly UFS and reading from DragonFly HAMMER.  Instead,
> you're comparing sequential read rate between DragonFly and FreeBSD7.
>
> _____________________________________________________
> DragonFly issue tracker <bugs@lists.dragonflybsd.org>
> <https://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1116>
> _____________________________________________________
>