Re: pulseaudio build

["Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, June 13, 2010 12:41 am, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :>> ./t_ml
> :> mlockall: Function not implemented
> :
> :Is it worth MFC'ing?  I have a vague feeling I had talked to someone
> about
> :this before, but I can't find evidence of it.
>
>    What direction are we talking about?  Making it return ENOSYS or
>    making it return success but otherwise be a NOP ?

Whichever makes it build on 2.6.  I don't know which that is.  I'm a bit
suspicious, because I don't remember pulseaudio breaking on 2.6/x86_64.