|From:||"Thomas E. Spanjaard" <tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:40:48 +0000|
:Matthew Dillon wrote: :> sys/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> -> sys/config/<KERNEL> :Wouldn't sys/arch/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> be better? Otherwise, why here? I considered it, but it isn't very user friendly to have to have your config files spread out all over the place. The most likely scenario for a DragonFly user is going to be a couple of configs for a virtual kernel architectures, a few for IA32 (UP and SMP), and ultimately a few for IA64. I think it makes a lot more sense for those files to be in one place. Also, having to specify the machine architecture in the config file AND put the config file in a special architecture-specific place is kinda redundant.
Cheers, -- Thomas E. Spanjaard tgen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Description: OpenPGP digital signature