DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2003-07
Re: Remove BIND, Sendmail, Perl and etc from base?
From a user/sysadmin point of view I am all for a package system like
the one debian.
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 10:10 AM, Craig Dooley wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I definitely agree that the user system should be built using packages.
People dont care about downloading a 300meg source tree and waiting an
to get a new release. Yes rpm systems are a hassle to upgrade, but
has shown that you dont need source for a system. Debian allows
do dpkg --get-selections > profile and have a list of programs to
current working system. I like the environment idea to allow multiple
instances of needed dependancies (it would fix things like debian with
or freebsd with freetype) but unless I am missing something, we're
gonna need a build system to create these packages. Also, a database
approach seems the easies way to conserve bandwidth and allow full
In my opinion, in the end, we should have a "buildworld" just rebuild
base packages and update them that way. People who care about the
get it just as easily, and people that dont won't ever have to worry.
will ports stay with just a new backend for building packages? Will
a new build environment? A binary downloading frontend seems a
also. Just my thoughts
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 05:32 pm, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
The eventual goal is to make *ALL* userland applications,
things like cp, ls, etc... all operate through the packaging
and remember that it is the packaging system's goal to support
installation of multiple versions of anything without conflict.
oh no ! please !
a fine-grained packaging system used for the core OS is just a pain :
fed up with DeathTrap or Mandrake or Suse or .... with their
- how do you upgrade such a machine ? (with something intelligent like
portupgrade ? but there are lots of oldish shared libs left behind)
- how do you duplicate a machine ? (preferably with some automatic
procedure) after living some time, it's very difficult to know the
set of base rpms you have to select to get the same install (with the
packages going in via dependencies)
One big selling point of FreeBSD is the relative ease of configuration
description : get the full OS, then add a smallish number of outside
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----