Re: softupdates as mount option?

[Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@xxxxxx>]

-On [20040527 03:42], Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>    On the otherhand, if I were to prioritize this it would be, well, 
>    dead last on my list because there just isn't enough of a benefit
>    in making it a mount option over what we have now, and there is a ton
>    of other work that needs to go into the system (just following the 
>    original goals list) that I would rather be working on.

But if someone wants to work on this and presents working patches would you
include it?

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7  9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/   | http://diary.in-nomine.org/
You are more than you think, less than you could be...