DragonFly BSD
DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2004-07
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Initial impressions of DFly


From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 01:09:25 -0700 (PDT)

:> extract is somewhat noticeable, though for both OSes it is much more 
:> noticeable on builds, though DFly performs better, subjectively, versus 
:> - -CURRENT (with ULE).  Even SCHED_BSD felt a little slower, however.
:
:ULE is fairly broken in a lot of workloads and should not be used for
:performance comparisons unless you're also going to benchmark
:SCHED_4BSD.
:
:Kris

   Note that DragonFly's current scheduler is also somewhat broken when it
   comes to music skips in the face of batch operations.  It's a known issue
   that we will tackle after 1.0.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]