DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2005-03
Re: Current stable tag slip status
Chris Pressey wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:05:23 +0800
Bill Hacker <wbh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd suggest to use lower release numbers.
I'm sure to branded a heretic here, but the 'numbers game'
is one of the less-attractive features of software.
I tend to agree, but I also think that - if we were to abandon the
traditional version numbering system - the alternative systems proposed
so far (here and on users@) are still more complicated than they have to
be. Why not just use the date (YYYYMMDD)? And add "RELEASE" on the end
to distinguish releases from snapshots.
And a single letter: R, S, C, X
I think we are safe (on this issues at least) with 2-digit
dates for another 90+ years.
- I stuck the 'DF' in 'coz of all the times I've seen folks
going back and forth over entirly different 'races' of
code before they twigged to that.
 'Course I thought the same when coding COBOL in
the 60's..... figured computers would be obsolete before