Re: DragonFly and Thinpad X61s

[Chris Turner <c.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill Hacker wrote:
> - scanning, ID'ing, init'ing SATA may be more 'aggressive', timing, 
> interrupt, & duty-cycle-wise under the two problematic OS'en reported 
> than under those which work OK.

wasn't something added not too long ago to parallelize device scanning / 
probing / etc .. ? Can't remember when that was..

is this an SMP or UP kernel?