DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2008-01
Re: HAMMER update 23-jan-08
Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
YONETANI Tomokazu <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Speaking of that, how will ownership be handled in HAMMER?
Hi. It seems that ownership and some file modes are not strictly
HAMMER right now is only a local file system, so these problems don't arise.
On NFS, last I checked, the user and group IDs are assigned to the
files on the server machine, but anyone on a client with the correct
user ID has access to the file. This means root on any client can
modify any file on the server. So all clients need to be trusted.
Is there a way around that in HAMMER?
This is a nasty situation with NFS and we definitely will come up with a
better way. I am planning to develop a distributed file system (hopefully
to be part of DragonFly), and I have some ideas, mainly involving public
Also, what authentication mechanism would be used across nodes in a
cluster: NIS, LDAP, or something else?
I think the system should be designed in a way that not every node in the
cluster needs to know about all authentication information. It should be
possible to establish trust relationships between machines (or specific
users of these machines, of course). Then a user id wouldn't be unique in
itself, but would require a qualifier, describing where this user id
originates from. You'd see users like "email@example.com"
instead of only "corecode". Authentication then would run as a part of
the cluster protocol. That's only my vision, though. I don't think there
is anything set in stone yet.
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \