Re: [Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

[Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :Why LVM why not follow the ZFS path ?
>
>     I think its a mistake to integrate the storage layer into the
>     filesystem.  That would effectively limit us to a single filesystem,
>     ZFS.

Well, ZFS itself isn't that integrated as it's said. You can use the 
low-level volume manager by itself and create UFS volumes on top of it. 
It isn't as straightforward as a simple volume manager since you still 
get the superfluous caching and checksumming but it works.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature