Re: Developer kprintf's

[Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Samuel J. Greear <sjg@evilcode.net> wrote:
> We have quite a few kprintf's in the kernel that do not necessarily
> report error conditions, they are purely informational and highlight
> odd or rare cases that often the end-user of the operating system
> really doesn't need to know about. This has been discussed quite a few
> times on IRC.
>
> I would like to put these under a sysctl like kern.developer and wrap
> them in a function like dkprintf unless anyone has any major
> objections. (I'm open to suggestions on the naming).
>
> Sam
>

Would ktr(4) be of good use?

Nuno