Re: Clean up bind commit to master, revert to vendor

["Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

[X-Post to kernel@ for discussion]

Jan Lentfer wrote:
> there was some discussion on irc about where README.DRAGONFLY and 
> README.DELETED had to go.
>
> I have left it the way I did it of vendor/LESS and as it was sugested on 
> irc (README.DRAGONFLY on master, README.DELETED on vendor).
>
> But generally this should be clarified and the consensus should make 
> it's way into development(7).

Yes, we should decide.  But both should be on the same branch, for 
coherency.

Reasons for master:
- those files don't belong to the tar ball

Reasons for vendor branch:
- the READMEs describe the files (and what was removed) of the tar ball

I don't mind either, just coherency.  I propose to decide on what goes 
where first, and after that do the import.  Or at least pack both files 
into the same branch.

cheers
  simon