Re: On SMP

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:31:34AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     rfork().  The same mechanism that the 1:1 library would use, but
>     it would only rfork for the number of cpus rather then rfork for
>     each thread.

The 1:1 library does a rfork for each thread, our own library would use
min(no of threads, no of cpus), right?

Joerg

> 
> 					-Matt
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>