Re: Version numbering for release DECISION!

[Eduardo Tongson <propolice@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:07:25 -0800, Chris Pressey
<cpressey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree 100% that the names should indicate the _purpose_ of the thing
> rather than its state or circumstances, simply because most people will
> be more interested in its purpose than in other factors.
> 
> So PRODUCTION is a better name than STABLE, DEVELOPMENT is a better name
> than UNTESTED or CURRENT, and PREVIEW is a better name than WORKING.
> 
DEVELOPMENT
PREVIEW
PRODUCTION

sound nice too and easily comprehended by the unwashed masses


-- 
                                                    Eduardo Tongson     
                                                    <pornadmin.net/~tongson>
                                                    <dragonflybsd.sf.net>