DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2005-08
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: increase number of inodes?

From: Emiel Kollof <coolvibe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:30:29 +0200

Matthew Dillon wrote:

[inode shortage snip]

Well, the defaults are pretty good as they stand but they are not
designed for squeezing large numbers of files onto fairly small
partitions. If you wanted to make newfs smarter you could have it
drop back to 1K/8K for filesystems less then, say, 2GB, or have it
mess with the default bytes-per-inode parameter based on the size
of the partition, but it would be a poor heuristic at best.

Hm, an extent-based filesystem would solve these kind of issues forever. It would also eliminate all kinds of slack that inodes cause. AFAIK a file smaller than sizeof(inode) will still occupy sizeof(inode). Hiten? Are you still planning on porting JFS someday? (not that I'm asking you to drop anything, but a timeframe like "Yeah, somewhere in the somewhat near future" would be good enough for me :)


[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]