Re: [OT] Micro$oft versus security

[walt <wa1ter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:

[...]
> Nevertheless they have been broken recently (about one year) and for MD5 
> for example single bits can be changed...

Okay, that's why I asked -- I didn't know that.  But why take a year
to break a secure hash when you can use a buffer overrun to gain
access to ten thousand Windows machines in a few minutes ;o)

As usual, M$ seems to have its priorities upside down and backwards.