Re: STLport?

[David Cuthbert <dacut@xxxxxxxxx>]

Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Which is the ultimate reason why I refuse to touch it. No program has
> the right to assume anything about the size of FILE, period.

Except the C++ iostreams library (which is part of STL <sigh>).  It 
requires knowledge about the internals of stdin/stdout to perform 
synchronization properly.

STLPort was a blessing back in the days when everyone shipped a slightly 
different STL implementation which didn't conform in strange ways -- g++ 
2.x was probably the worst offender.