DragonFly BSD
DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2006-09
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hints on kernel config for a dula pII/450 system anyone?


From: "Sepherosa Ziehau" <sepherosa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:20:30 -0400

Oops, sorry. the attached patch is against 1.6 release.

Best Regards,
sephe

On 9/18/06, Gergo Szakal <bastyaelvtars@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> The problem may be caused by that second skc's skc_probe()
> reinitializes a global "sk_serializer"
>
> Please try the attached patch.
>

Thanks, but the patch fails to apply successfully against the 20060912
snapshot of 1.6-release, here is what I get:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
%patch < /root/sk.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- if_sk.c.orig       2006-09-18 09:20:58.514614912 -0400
|+++ if_sk.c    2006-09-18 09:28:54.199299848 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file if_sk.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 261.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1075 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 failed at 1164.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1312 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1326 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1424 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #7 failed at 1507.
2 out of 7 hunks failed--saving rejects to if_sk.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- if_skreg.h.orig    2006-09-18 09:21:52.348430928 -0400
|+++ if_skreg.h 2006-09-18 09:24:14.550812880 -0400
--------------------------
Patching file if_skreg.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1434.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1463.
done
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry to be a pain in the a**, I'd fix this if I could.



--
Live Free or Die

Attachment: sk1.diff
Description: Binary data



[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]