DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2008-11
Re: 2.0 vs 2.1
2008/11/29 Matthew Dillon <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> :Hi All,
> :I'm running DragonFly 2.0.1-RELEASE #7: Wed Sep 24 20:39:13 PDT 2008
> :on my home server with 300G HAMMER backup storage.
> :As I can remember, there was some bugfixes in HAMMER code and some
> :changes mentioned on periodic snapshoting.
> :Also, development branch has improvements (or just a patch) in NVidia
> :driver so this is also interesting for me.
> :Commit rate is quite low last weeks and not relate to HAMMER. Is it
> :safe to upgrade now and should I choose "master" instead of "rel2_0"?
> :How stable is "master" currently? How smooth should upgrade be?
> :Dennis Melentyev
> The current HEAD has a lot of networking improvements and
> parallelization work, and there could be some instability there.
> That said, it seems pretty stable.
> Most of the HAMMER work was MFC'd to the 2.0.x branch and it
> should be fine.
Downtime due to networking is not a big problem.
HAMMER stability is much more significant requirement.
I'll give HEAD a try.
- 2.0 vs 2.1
- From: "Dennis Melentyev" <email@example.com>
- Re: 2.0 vs 2.1
- From: Matthew Dillon <firstname.lastname@example.org>