DragonFly users List (threaded) for 2010-04
Re: Minimum size for a hammer file system?
Am 23.04.2010 11:47, schrieb Steve O'Hara-Smith:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:21:27 +0200
Sascha Wildner<email@example.com> wrote:
Am 23.04.2010 09:19, schrieb Colin Adams:
I thought I had previously seen (on this mailing list) advice that
hammer was designed for use on 500GB systems or bigger. Accordingly, as
I only have a 160GB drive, I am not using it.
But just now (after reading some of today's messages), I took a look at
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/ to learn more about hammer. There is
says it is designed to be used on 50GB or more. So was I misreading
earlier, or have improvements meant it is now practical for smaller file
50MB is what we recommend officially, thought people also have run it on
Uh, sorry, of course! :)