Re: NetBSD hammer with fuse and hammerread

["Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Daniel Lorch wrote:

> > Daniel: please add a license to your new source files. Please consider 
> > using the standard DragonFly Project license (see hammer_disk.h and
> > hammerread.c for same example).
> 
> I guess for the FUSE code I'm free to choose, but what's the best pick
> for code that might eventually go into the Linux kernel tree?
> 
> And then there's the whole story about coding standards. Can code
> written according to BSD style co-exist in the Linux kernel?