| From: | Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:48:31 +0200 |
Lately Matthew Dillon told: > Hmm. There could be a problem with that. If the ordering of the > libraries change the checksums will not (I think), but the > patchups will now be applied in the wrong order. > > Maybe the prebinding should be explicit... that is, you run a > program to prebind a binary and it stores the prebinding in the > same directory as the binary. Just running the binary would not > in itself *create* a prebinding file, but it would check to see if > one exists and is valid. Oh, I forgot mentioning that. I'd keep a binary-info file which lists all objects in the order in which they need to be loaded. Furthermore, linking is explicit at the moment and should stay so. cheers simon -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News
Attachment:
pgp00016.pgp
Description: PGP signature