Re: Bug Tracking System [Was: Re: final thoughts - bug tracking system]

[Carl Schmidt <cschmidtlib@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:21:58PM -0700, Ben Cadieux wrote:
>  
>
> > I think perhaps I'll start with the "XML" comment, since I would argue
> > that it's the most humorous.  XML is not critical for databases,
> > that's a "baffling" comment to make.  Besides all the lovely
> > concurrent access problems, repeatedly parsing a large XML file is not
> > a particularly good idea unless your goal is to encourage denial of
> > service.
> >    
>
> I'd suggest that you try and understanding what object serialization with
> regard to Smalltalk systems. That's circa 1978. Then ask where you where
> when all of that stuff was being discussed and how you missed that critical
> concept so that your knowledge isn't so dated and barbaric. Then when you
> get your attitude adjustment, you'd might listen to folks so that you
> actually learn something.
>
> bill
>
>
>  
Okay...guys (or maybe girls?)...who cares?

This is the *kernel* list. I don't know why the hell the bug tracking system
post made its way here in the first place. This is a completely stupid 
discussion
that you two ought to be having outside of the list. It's Matt's project, he
can do it in whatever language he wants to do it in. You are all 
*volunteers*,
you can come and go as you please. If you don't like the way things are 
going,
then I'm sure you can find a project that fits your needs, or perhaps 
start your
own, just as Matt did.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm here for a reason, because 
the project
interests me. I repeat: *the project* interests me.
--
Carl Schmidt