Re: User API still a goal?

["Nicolas Thery" <nthery@xxxxxxxxx>]

2008/6/10 Robert Luciani <rluciani@gmail.com>:
> If the "micro threads" don't have to be POSIX compliant, aren't there
> already many languages which provide plenty of concurrency within
> threads? Some are even SMP aware and don't do stupid scheduling decisions.

Out of curiosity, where do these languages get SMP awareness from? Do
they need some kernel-level support?

Cheers,
Nicolas