On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Justin C. Sherrill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sun, February 20, 2011 4:28 pm, Tim Darby wrote:I've had disks that go bad, and reading the raw data for recovery ends up
> The good news is that it's recovering a ton of data! The
> bad news is that it's taking an incredible amount of time. So far it's
> running 24 hours. Is that to be expected? The bad disk had approximately
> 50GB on it, as reported by the df utility, but I don't know how much of
> that is snapshots.
being very, very slow just when trying to read from the actual 'bad'
portions of disk. So this could take quite a while, just because of how
the physical disk is responding.