DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2008-02
DragonFly BSD
DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2008-02
[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]


> <20080211132514.GF48892@staatsfeind.org>
From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
Subject: Re: Globbing (was Re: HAMMER update 10-Feb-2008)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:33:56 +0100
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-request@crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-kernel@crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20080211132514.GF48892@staatsfeind.org>
Sender: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: kernel-errors@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 14
X-Trace: 1202741217 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 855
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:12082

Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> * Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> A few years ago FreeBSD increased the limit to 256 KB.
>> I don't know if DragonFly did the same, but it doesn't
>> matter much
> Nope, we haven't.  Our size is still 65536, FreeBSD has 262144.
> But I don't see any reason not to increase the limit.

I don't see ANY reason why to increase it.  There is simply NO POINT in
doing so.  It will ALWAYS be a limit.  Limit keeps being limit, thus no
change in limit necessary, as it doesn't change the situation.  QED.


[Date Prev][Date Next]  [Thread Prev][Thread Next]  [Date Index][Thread Index]