DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2008-10
Re: Source Control system results and discussion
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Matthew Dillon
> The question now devolves down to those people who commit into the
> system. Do we use Git as the master repository and Mercurial as the
> slave, or do we use Mercurial as the master repository and Git as the
> I propose second that we use Git as the master repository and Mercurial
> as the slave, but allow committers to commit to either and auto-merge
> in both directions.
Are there really people that will refuse to use Git to contribute?
What is the advantage of having two write systems vs just have hg be a
read-only mirror of Git?
> Only clean merges will auto-commit. A failure will require manual
> intervention using Git, which should be trivial to handle as all the
> data will be in the Git staging and master branches.
This would be one of the disadvantages -- having to deal with
conflicts between replicants.
If it is because of the tie we are trying to do this, I hear by change my vote: