| From: | Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp_o2@xxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:07:50 +0200 |
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:43:26 +0100 Alex Hornung <ahornung@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24/09/10 13:37, Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote: > > I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for > > how long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It > > lingers from 80s of the last... Cenury of the last Millennium. ;-) > > > Sorry, but I simply fail to see why we need 'mc' and 'lynx' in base. > If someone can't use the standard unix commands, he should possibly > learn before using a unix system. The same pervasive attitude... You failed but I did not fail, the more so I explained in plain English (I hope) why the toots might be helpful. I know standard unix commands I program in shell. Does it mean that I should stick to them for full 50 years of my life? Pathetic... Of course, I am not so stupid to bang my head onto concrete wall of chastity of Unix diehard users. BTW. I do not want to creat another thread not be slamed for my uncouth character. It would be nice and convenient for ***ME*** if the DFBSD used the idea of system software chunks aka sets conjured up by NetBSD and OpenBSD teams. Why not creat one more set of useful tools with Lynx, MC, and other apps? CD size is big and modern networks provide fast downloads. "Sorry, but I simply did not fail to see that" DFBSD system might gain having such tools distibuted on its ISO and be the leader on the BSD trek of all BSD flavors. For all those like me who like to use mc or lynx. We have the right to breath too, haven't we? Regards -- Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp_o2@o2.pl
Attachment:
pgp00009.pgp
Description: PGP signature